Methods used to monitor implementation of the proposed change

The above illustrates the close relationship between monitoring, planning and implementation. While quantitative methods typically seek to answer who, what, where and how much, qualitative methods answer why and how.

Basics of Monitoring, Evaluating and Deviating from the Strategic Plan

A vision is a crystallised long-range image or idea of what can be and should be accomplished. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Evaluation Working Group has developed a framework for program evaluation that includes steps to guide you in engaging stakeholders, describing the program, focusing the evaluation, gathering evidence, interpreting data and developing a strategy for reporting results.

See Revealing Hidden Resources. Defining these roles will improve the odds of a strategic plan's success. Rewards also give employees a sense that progress accompanies a change.

Who is involved Using this resource would require the involvement of many individuals and resources since evaluation and continuous quality improvement activities are long-term and ongoing processes. How expensive would a new data collection effort be?


To inform the public about the implementation of the action plan may play the decisive role as to whether the implementation will be successful or not happen at all.

Data management Observe Set up a system and tools that allow keeping track of changes based on the indicators and targets, considering PSIR. To carry out new policies and procedures effectively, employees need a solid grasp of the plan's contents. Review the Outcomes Smart strategic planners assume the need for constant follow-up, as "Entrepreneur" magazine outlined in its January interview with the Subway sandwich chain's cofounder, Fred DeLuca.

How to Communicate, Monitor and Control the Implementation of Your Strategic Plan

But if a project implements environmental sanitation activities, and a clear improvement of health indicators is recorded, there is probably a connection between the two. Secondary information sources would be tapped most of the time, although rapid on-site research would be conducted on an ad-hoc basis.

In this manner, indirect information on the development of the project can be obtained; the second set of indicators would be applied on a more frequent basis. Situation analysis and problem identification should be monitored to ensure that correct and up dated information is always available about the community and its problems.

Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

The system of indicators should be divided into two sub-systems. Communication and involvement The effectiveness of implementation is very much dependent on the partnerships developed and the involvement and cooperation of various stakeholders.

It is usually collected through instruments such as surveys and personal interviews. These groups and individuals that undertake particular roles in the project are called "actors. Monitoring Indicators are of four types, namely; Input indicators: Discussing and agreeing on the activities to be undertaken during implementation; Defining the different actors inside and outside the community, and their roles; and Defining and distributing costs and materials necessary to implement the project.

The implementation is where it shows. Since monitoring should be integrated into all aspects or phases of the process, let us go through each phase and look at the monitoring concerns associated with each.

The objective is to use synergies, avoid double work and report as efficiently as possible. The results can be used for improving and refining your action plans to help you stay on target.

Obviously, not all changes recorded over time with regard to the conditions of poverty, social exclusion and social capital can be considered solely as effects of the project being monitored.

Program planning, implementation and evaluation tools

The developers recommend conducting a pre-post method with a comparison group, but if that is not feasible, than to do a pre-post. Charisma is a leadership characteristic that can help influence employees to take early and sustained action.

In this case, the variation of health indicators would measure, even if indirectly, the effects of the project. In this case, combine information about the ongoing implementation processes with the call for cooperation and involvement. Before any attempts to implement a project, the planners, implementors and beneficiaries should set up goals and objectives.

The IMS delivers a platform to connect the various data sources. How valid and accurate are the data?Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website. Process Evaluation to Monitor Implementation | SAMHSA. Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this.

Monitoring should be executed by all individuals and institutions which have an interest (stake holders) in the project. To efficiently implement a project, the people planning and implementing it should plan for all the interrelated stages from the beginning.

The successful implementation of new working methods and practices or integrating new businesses into a group is dependent upon the willing and effective co-operation of employees and management.

Many change initiatives and programmes fail because they are derailed by the “people factor”! Strategic Plan Step 6: Monitor and Review The final step in any planning process is to monitor and evaluate progress.

The same way as you check the signposts along a road when completing a journey, it is similarly important to check that development is on track. With the implementation of the strategic programme and the action plan, the management cycle reaches its very core: all the preceding assessment and planning has the overall objective of improving the way the city functions in terms of sustainable development.


In today’s organizations, the rate of change has never been more rapid or more constant. Whether the change is a small one, like the implementation of a new system, or a much bigger one such as a company takeover or merger, the way that change is managed .

Methods used to monitor implementation of the proposed change
Rated 4/5 based on 35 review